Old or Out of Print Bluebird Books
& References (Part 2)
From: "Keith & Sandy Kridler" kridler"at"1starnet.com
Subject: must have book
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 07:56:35 -0500
Keith Kridler
For those in the Northeast you must have this old book, "Useful
birds and their Protection" By Edward H Forbush. Printed
for the "Mazzzchusetts Board of Agriculture 1907"
this is actually the second printing as an earlier one of 2,500
copies sold out in 1904 I believe. One of the things it mentions
is when different species became extinct in Mass. It states
the cold June of 1903 (or 04) wiped out the Purple Martins and
tells about the efforts of pulling up Martin colonies, poles
houses and birds; from the west and shipping them by overnight
canon ball express trains to Mass. to re-establish the species.
Dismal failure! Of course there is good stuff about other cavity
nesters! Off to work. KK
From: "Keith & Sandy Kridler" kridler"at"1starnet.com
Subject: another quote from an old bird book
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 09:02:28 -0500
Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant, Texas
From "Wild Birds of New England by Chester A. Reed, S.
B. Publisher
Chas. K.
Reed, Worchester, Mass. 1912.
It is a tiny book with about 40 pages devoted to birds but
with 40 color illustrations, as usual with these old books "Bluebirds"
are mentioned early and in this book starting in the second
paragraph.
"Although a few BLUEBIRDS pass the winter in the state,
chiefly in warm swamps, they are usually regarded as migrants
and their return in spring is eagerly awaited. They come the
latter part of February and their cheery warbles greet us from
orchard and roadside. As Burroughs, in his charming manner,
explains in "Wake Robin": --When Nature made the Bluebird
she wished to propitiate both the sky and the earth, so she
gave him the color of one on his back and the hue of the other
on his breast, and ordained that his appearance in spring should
denote that the strife and war between these two elements was
at an end. He is the peace-harbinger; in him the celestial and
terrestrial strike hands and are fast friends." Cavities
in trees or posts furnish suitable homes sites within which
to lay their very pale blue eggs and rear their young. They
are real sociable chaps and, provided that English Sparrows
are properly suppressed, will occupy bird houses or boxes in
our very dooryards."
Later he writes, "With the exception of Robins and Bluebirds,
all thrushes are rather timid, shy and retiring, preferring
deep woods rather that the open.
On of the most interesting descriptions in the book was about
the Purple Martin, "Then there is that large and well-known
species, the PURPLE MARTIN, the male of which is glossy purplish-black
all over. Many of them now commonly nest in bird houses erected
for them, but the majority cling to the habits of their ancestors
and nest in cavities of trees."
Note that in 1912 that the "English Sparrow now called
House Sparrow" needed to be "suppressed" if you
wanted bluebirds in your "dooryard". 90 years after
this was written Fawzi Emad and flock are about to start up
a new state group for the bluebirds in Maryland. With the able
help of Bruce Burdett's conspiracy group and Haleya's Mass.
group the bluebirds should survive another 90 years in New England
states. Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi have relatively new
groups and all of these are due in major part to the roles that
The North American Bluebird Society and Cornell continue to
support through their wonderful organizations. Bluebird-L had
a lot to do with Kathy Clark ramrodding the Pennsylvania's Bluebird
state organization. It is normally the sheer will power of a
few individuals that hold these groups together. By seeing how
many people are moved by these "blue" birds it makes
it easier for many to continue the tremendous amount of work
these groups entail to keep them going and growing and ultimately
fledging the "Peace-Harbingers" for the generations
to come.
I believe this was the best year ever for Bluebird-L and NABS
and affiliates. We may not fledge record numbers of bluebirds
but this is going to be one of the best ever graduating classes
of bluebirders and by sheer numbers of super dedicated nestbox
monitors we will make a difference for years to come.Thank you
to ALL involved from backyard monitors to those responsible
for raising the money and paying the bills to allow these organizations
to continue to do what they do best! Share the Joy of the Birds
this year and they will sing your praises come spring! Keith
Kridler
From: "Gary Springer" springer"at"alltel.net
Subject: Old Birding Literature
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 21:55:25 -0500
There is much that can be learned by reading about birds in
old literature.
But, be cautious of drawing conclusions.
Many books are written by authors that learned most, if not
everything, from what they read in books of the previous generation.
Therefore, misunderstandings are perpetuated in the literature.
As late as 1878 some of the most accomplished and respected
ornithologists still believed birds hibernated in hollow trees
or under the ground.
Migration of Birds by Charles Dixon, 1892
Gary Springer
From: WatercressFarm"at"aol.com
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 09:52:04 EST
Subject: (no subject)
Does anyone know of some early writings by William Duncan?
He wrote about bluebirds in the 1940s I believe. I would very
much like to obtain some of his early bluebird work. Thanks!
Mark Ritke
Titusville, PA 16354
From: "Keith & Sandy Kridler" kridler"at"1starnet.com
Subject: William G. Duncan
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 20:00:41 -0600
Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant, Texas
William G. Duncan did not write so much about bluebirds as he
actually (in his later years anyway) worked as a clearing house
for Bluebird information.
When he received enough "new" ideas he added them
all together and copied them and sent them out to people who
showed an interest in bluebirds. I believe at the height of his newsletter he was mailing about
1,800 copies from Kentucky about 24 times a year. When I finish
taxes I will dig through my old files as I know I have a couple of copies he sent me
in the early 70's. He might like to look down and see some of
these old newsletters copied and passed out again! About half
of the content of these newsletters were devoted to leading
edge ecology ideas for that time...Larry Zeleny began writing
a monthly column on bluebirds in the Nature Society News in
the 60's all through the 70's and he and William exchanged information
monthly and this column of Larry Zeleny's slowly took the place
of the Duncan newsletters....These guys kept the faith and built
the base of modern bluebirding as we know it today.
Dang I wish they had been with Sandy and I today when we talked
with 70 fifth graders....Nearly 70 of them have LOOKED in a
nestbox and seen either bluebird eggs or babies. More than 40 of them already have up
nestboxes. More than 30 of them have had bluebirds at THEIR
house nesting in their boxes. Most of them have already built a nestbox. 18 had flying
squirrels in some of their nestboxes. These students already
know more about bluebirds and other cavity nesters than I did when I was 25....KK
From: Bruce Burdett [mailto:blueburd"at"tds.net]
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 10:18 AM
Subject: Chapman symbol
Keith Kridler, et al, I wonder if you, Keith, or anyone out
there, can explain to me and Horace what my old Chapman means
when it describes the dimensions of an egg as ".96 x .71" with
the dot, or decimal point, up high, where the quotation mark
normally is, or the apostrophe. I've never seen this designation.((
The Chapman is a 1928 version, "Birds of Eastern North America,
and the egg is the Towhee's.)) Was he talking about millimeters?
Bruce Burdett SW NH
From: judymellin [mailto:judymellin"at"netzero.net]
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 7:47 PM
Re: Chapman symbol
Bruce- According to A Field Guide to Birds' Nests by Hal Harrison
(1975), the Eastern (formerly rufous-sided) towhee egg is 23.1
mm x 17.0 mm so that would seem to put it a different enough
size that the Chapman's designation would mean something different.
Unless that is the equivalent in inches? When I look at a ruler
that gives both, it does seem to be compatible but math has
never been a strong point for me! Judy Mellin NE IL.
From: Keith & Sandy Kridler [mailto:txbluebirder"at"sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 10:34 AM
Re:Chapman symbol
OLD books
I have the 1904 Chester A. Reed book "NORTH AMERICAN BIRDS EGGS" and they have the decimal
point in the correct location. I believe Judy explained the
MM conversion differences and we need to remember that when
my book and the 1928 Chapman book were printed before the metric
system became common in the USA. They were printed with plates
of "moveable type". In other words each letter, number or decimal
point was a separate piece and the blank space behind the period
in a sentence was ALWAYS a double blank. The typesetter was
given a written copy and normally a "he" would run through
the boxes of letters and symbols with blinding speed assembling
a double page at a time. Remember that a double page of "moveable
type" would have all the letters and symbols backwards! He
would then have to proof read this double page before sending
it on to the printing press where they clamped this heavy block
into the press, inked the block, printed a page and inked the
block and printed another until they had enough for the number
of books needed. This double page was then flipped over and
two more pages were printed on the back....They had to allow
for mistakes in the ink and a careless press man might have
the whole block "blow up" and have to send a box of loose letters
back to the typesetter to "fix" it again. Normally the press
man at this time could not read. To get the right and left
columns to "line" up, once the page was all laid out the typesetter
had to go back and add shims and spaces between the letters
to make it fit the page evenly. I will bet that this is a "first
edition" book of Chapman's and IF they ever made a second printing
and had extra money they might have corrected this "typesetters" mistake
that the proof reader missed. This is NOT as easy proof reading
either with the "trial printing".
I have a 24 page booklet
on ''THE ENGLISH SPARROW AS A PEST" and when you "open" up
the booklet, page 8 and page 17 are on one side of the sheet
and page 7 and 18 are on the back! Hold up a book or printed
page and try to read this backward print in a mirror and you
will see why mistakes in old books and newspapers were so common.
Now go to "THE BLUEBIRD MONITOR'S GUIDE" hunt up the photograph
of Joe Huber with his sparrow trap taken in his workshop and
get a magnifying glass out and read the writing on the paint
cans behind him....Jack Griggs, Cynthia Berger and I worked
for two years on this book and a press man in Hong Kong reversed
all of the "positive" prints.....It would be kind of cool to
see if the Chapman book had second printings and if these were
corrected! Keith Kridler
|