Bluebird Evolution and History (Part 2)
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 23:55:43 -0800
From: "Real Bird Homes.Com" springer"at"alltel.net
Subject: Where did all the Eastern Bluebirds go?
I am becoming more and more convinced that the house sparrow had absolutely
nothing to do with the dramatic drop in the population of Eastern Bluebirds that
occurred sometime between 1940 and 1950.
I had previously written that older farmers here in Northeast Georgia
recalled that the populations of house sparrows dropped right along with the
Eastern Bluebirds.
One such farmer said that until the early to mid 40's, hundreds of house
sparrows roosted in the attic spaces of houses and in barns in large communal
roosts. It was not unusual to fill several bushel baskets of nesting material
when exterminating house sparrows.
I recently discovered the following text in a 1946 Audubon Bird Guide:
"Today the available habitat is carrying all the English Sparrows it
can accommodate, and the same high reproductive rate produces no year to year
increase in total population."
And, in the 1919 Standard dictionary of facts it is written that the house
sparrow "OFTEN does great damage to cornfields and gardens".
Based on these three sources I believe that more than 20 years before any
decline in bluebird populations was experienced, there were hundreds of times
more house sparrows than there are today, and, that one farmer I talked to is
correct when he said that the house sparrow populations were decimated in the
40's and have never come close to their previous populations.
When you also consider that the house sparrow's population is restricted to
mans occupation, and how much land still is not within 5 miles of any
significant development, it becomes even harder to believe that the house
sparrow was much of a factor in the near elimination of the Eastern Bluebird
from its entire range.
I believe it is important to know what happened to the population of Eastern
Bluebirds so it isn't threatened again.
Initially it might sound reasonable when it is explained that the Eastern
Bluebird couldn't compete with the house sparrow and starlings for nesting
cavities. But consider also that any walk in the country where there are even a
few trees of at least 30 years of age will reveal dozens of cavities suitable
for bluebird nesting far from any house sparrow populations. Suitable nesting
cavities in trees are not rare by any means.
Further, this year one of our list members photographed an eastern bluebird
that nested on TOP of a fence post and the nest attempt was successful. This
year I observed a bluebird nest successfully from a hole in the wall of an old
building in a house sparrow infested town. Another list member reported a
bluebird nesting in a shoebox in a dressing room of an athletic facility.
This demonstrates how adaptable this bird is in its nesting habits. Even
acceptance of a nest box is proof of how adaptable the bird is in selecting
nesting sites.
How then could lack of nesting sites have led to the Eastern Bluebird's near
elimination when for more than three decades when populations of house sparrows
were many times what they are today, farmers enjoyed Eastern Bluebirds coming
and going to their nest boxes on top of fence posts in their back yard vegetable
gardens at the same time their houses and barns were home to literally hundreds
of house sparrows?
What really caused the near extinction of the Eastern Bluebird?
Gary Springer
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 07:33:39 EST
From: Phl806"at"cs.com
Subject: Re: [Bluebird] Where did all the Eastern Bluebirds go?
try cold weather. i believe it comes in cycles for the bluebird. to quote
one article: "many individuals of the species remain during the winter
months in northern latitudes. a 'nor' easter' can bring snow and freezing
temperatures.........which infrequently cost him his life.a real tragedy of
thsi kind occurred in the spring of 1895, when many species of migratory birds,
but especially bluebirds, were caught in the wave of extremely cold
weather..............thousands of bluebirds perished in the bitter cold which
swept through the middle and gulf states. their frozen bodies were found
everywhere---in barns and other outhouses where the poor things had vainly
sought shelter; in the fields and woods, and even along the roadsides. in
thenlocalities affected,they were entirely exterminated." quoted from
BIRDS OF AMERICA (1917). it's my belief that it's nature's way of thinning out
the crop....surely it killed hosp as well. BTW, this very same freeze
killed off the idea of growing citrus in my area (nw florida). until that
spring, oranges were grown and sold in the entire gulf coast area.
Phil Berry
Gulf Breeze, FL
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 06:59:50 -0600
From: "Fread J. Loane" firefrost2"at"earthlink.net
Subject: Re: [Bluebird] Where did all the Eastern Bluebirds go?
Gary Springer has provoked some deeper thoughts on this "mystery". I would
greatly appreciate hearing Keith and Dean expound with their thoughts and ideas
concerning this matter. To date, some ideas have been advanced, but none are
broad enough to cover the entire Sialia species.
My personal belief is that "a series of events" occurred which led to the low
populations of Sialia.
Fread J. Loane
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 11:21:22 -0800
From: "Real Bird Homes.Com" springer"at"alltel.net
Subject: Re: [Bluebird] Where did all the Eastern Bluebirds go?
Thank you for putting forth this idea Phil.
Without more investigation, the possibility that extremely severe weather was
a major contributing factor in the disappearance of Eastern Bluebirds can not be
ruled out.
However, I am skeptical.
Death leaves an indelible imprint and kill offs of the magnitude you
mentioned are well documented, remembered and talked about for many years, as
is evidenced by the 1917 writing, a full 22 years after the 1895 killing freeze.
And to be the primary factor, it seems it would have to have been even more
severe because I've neither heard nor read of other periods when Eastern
Bluebirds became rare.
Has anyone read about, heard people talk about, or remember a wide spread
kill off similar to the one cited for 1895, in the years between the early 40's
and the early 50's?
Hard freezes are also well remembered. I'll have to canvas the old timers to
see what years they remember as having devastating effect.
One Georgian remembers a spring when temperatures dropped so low that the
base of huge hickory trees split open with a loud crack because the sap inside
them expanded upon freezing. I believe that was in the 30's but I'll confirm the
year.
Does anyone know of a web site that would present enough meteorological data
to determine the merits of this idea?
Gary Springer
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 11:02:08 -0600
From: "Keith & Sandy Kridler" kridler"at"1starnet.com
Subject: Re: [Bluebird] Where did all the Eastern Bluebirds go?
...Loss of trees is unbelievable due to the 3 year drought in our area! No
eastern red cedar berries, hackberry, huckleberry & even sumac is lacking
fruit. First time I have ever seen large trees filled with mistletoe (spelled
missile toe by my spell checker :-)!) that has the mistletoe hanging dead from
the hot dry winds that ripped our area for a week during the drought. It is
years like this with a combination of cold and ice/freezing rain the next winter
that will wreck havoc on insect eating birds.
During the 1950's dust bowl years a very similar event occurred followed by a
ripping cold winter with records still standing and this had to decimate some
species since bird feeding especially for those in the thrush family was non
existent. The 1890's cold wave that wiped out the cattle industry from Montana
to Texas and ended the open range and caused a world wide depression. (Holland's
bulb industry was heavy into Narcissus and the Paper White varieties numbered
over 1,800 named varieties and this same cold wave that went through the US also
wiped out Europe's bulb industry has only less than 100 of these varieties
surviving. Millions of acres of "hardy" bulbs froze in the ground in Europe.
Check the record cold for your area and I believe you will find in January of
the late 1890's that this two week period will still hold the all time record
cold. No hay was cut and stacked during these years and longhorn cattle starved
to death by the millions across the western states and English speculation in
the meat industry in the US caused economic panic worldwide.
In the 1930-40's tobacco reigned as king in the eastern half of the US as a
farm crop. Tobacco barns utilized cheap wood and barrel type heaters to cure the
crop. It was VERY common to find upwards of 300 bluebirds in a single barrel
heater that had a cheap steel pipe for a smoke stack with no rain cap on top.
Untold millions of cavity nesting birds were and are still killed each spring in
these type chimney's. Each spring I get calls from people who have bluebirds to
wood ducks to owls who are in their house fireplace! How many birds die in open
topped pipe used for corner or stretcher posts for wire fences. Not until the
1950's did used oilfield pipe get cheap enough to use for fencing. During the
world wars ALL unnecessary steel, copper and aluminum was melted down for the
war effort. We have millions of open topped pipe used for goal posts and
baseball back stops in ideal bluebird habitat. I have watched bluebirds enter
and go down the open exhaust pipes on diesel tractors and trucks. When did these
become common? After world war II.
After World War II hundreds of thousands of cheap aircraft and thousands of
well trained pilots were out of work, coupled with the recent discovery of
DDT and sister insecticides and herbicides and fungicides and massive fields
being plowed with cheap tractors and you have the invention of the crop dusters
who could spray thousands of acres a day. Gary mentions the House Sparrows
between the Great Wars wrecking the grain crops. In old government manuals
you will find recipes for mixing a natural poison strychnine with grain to
kill off the blackbirds, House Sparrows etc. Bob-o-links were poisoned in
the south because they feasted on the gulf coast rice fields before migrating
to Cuba and South America where they were eaten as a deliciously fatty meat
bird. Even into the 1980's many southern towns used poison laced gopher bait
(Milo, sorghum, corn mix) spread on down town roofs to wipe out pigeons which
also thinned out House Sparrows, doves etc. Although it was illegal for farmers
in the 1970's to poison flocks of birds eating up your grain crop county extension
agents would show you how to set your gopher machine to apply the poisoned
grain ABOVE ground instead of BELOW ground. This was widespread knowledge
and would decimate the House Sparrows feeding in the fields. This "bait" was
also used at grain elevators and feed mills and worked on rats as well as
birds. This was a real No-No use of grain and few will ever admit to using
this but was a very widespread practice. Many dairy operators and hog farmers
would spread this to protect their expensive grain from going to birds instead
of the livestock.
Forest defragmentation has made it more difficult for slow flying birds to
cross miles of mostly tree less land without becoming hawk food. Fly over the US
and you will see from 33,000 feet that the only forests are really ribbons where
it is too wet or too hilly to timber! The largest forest areas in states like
Iowa or Kansas are actually in city limits as yard trees or around farm
buildings and out lying houses!
Changing from wood to metal fence posts! Again this happened after the early
1950's. This is probably one of the greatest "Myths" about bluebird decline in
my estimation. OK in Texas it was required by state law that ALL fence posts
along roadways be made from rot resistant wood, with bois de arc (bodark, hedge
apple, horse apple tree) as the #1 wood. These posts from the 1930's to 1950's
are still in use and almost NONE of them are big enough for a downy woodpecker
to use. Even after 60 years they are still woodpecker proof! A bluebird needs at
least a 3" round cavity and this takes at least a 5" post and these size wood
posts were split into four other posts! Very few farmers had the wood or the
time to place posts in the ground that were bigger than 6" which would attract a
woodpecker! Besides how many actual cavities made by a woodpecker have you ever
seen down at the 54" height of most fence lines? And even corner posts large
enough to rot out the center and make an open topped cavity would have been the
least likely nest site for the bluebirds to survive in due to weather,(a 2" rain
will drown them, 2 hours of direct summer southern sun will fry the eggs or
young) predators ETC. Most ranchers in our area covered the tops of their corner
posts with sheet metal to prevent rot in the first place. Most wood line posts
sold are less than 4" with a 3" top being very popular. Only reason these fence
posts are listed as a decline reason as people walking by could actually see the
eggs and few people climbed trees to where the woodpeckers were making millions
of cavities.
The switch from untreated power/telephone poles to creosote treated poles
would have had a bigger effect on the decline in nest cavities but even so
treated poles are riddled by woodpeckers in this area and this is the cause of
the largest loss of rural electric power in East Texas.
Cats: Everyone knows about them and they became popular in the 50's and 60's.
kids & BB
guns probably killed LOTS of tame bluebirds again their heyday in the 50's
late 70's.
So the reason for the decline in bluebirds from the 1900's would be weather
(documented declines in bluebird survival in the severe winters of the late
1970's show that MAJOR losses as high as 60% occurred in many northern states
and most southern states, go to breeding bird surveys for exact numbers of
decline in your state) With super severe winters in the 1890's & 1950's with no
breeding bird records we can guess the same thing happened. Then throw in the
changes from wood to steel and mule plowing to tractor plowing, hand picking of
pest insects to insecticides. It all boils down to more people abusing the land
and not allowing enough space for all creatures.
Bluebirds (all creatures) have always had a whole host of predators and
natural disasters to deal with and evolve with. Add in a few man made hazards
that will kill just 1% more of a species and they cannot hold their own. We
wiped out the bear, cougar, eagles, wolves and allowed species like deer to
multiply in many areas to the point of being pests but for predators of
bluebirds like raccoons we now plant millions of acres of corn to increase their
numbers, many people leave out cat and dog food for coons and opossums and the
later have spread all the way to Canada due to free food. Snakes & cowbirds
benefit from forest defragmentation. Falcons have easier hunting in open areas.
Nearly every predator for bluebirds has increased in the last 50 years plus the
above mentioned hazards. Sorry this post was too long but every acre of land
covered by roads and every house built effects the number of other species
allowed to live with the billions of humans on this fine earth. KK
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 07:37:48 -0800
From: "judymellin" judymellin"at"netzero.net
Subject: bluebird demise and house sparrow growth
OK- bluebird populations plunged in the 1940s and 1950s and, it seems, people
think house sparrows proliferated. What happened in the 40s and 50s? WWII (the
big one!) was ending, soldiers were returning, families were growing. Since they
needed more space, more space there would be. Not only were many, many small
woodlots cut down to make room for housing (and Eastern bluebirds are birds of
open woodlands, not deep forests) but rampant urbanization took over. What is
the greatest habitat for house sparrows? Urban environments!
I monitor a 600 acre restoration site and have identified 175 species there
but house sparrow is not one of them. I will tell you that there is one small
bridge on our site that I refuse to cross because THAT bird is on the other
side, close to the main road that marks the southern border of our site. We have
no housing close to us, although a large development was put in on our western
border about five years ago but there is enough separation that the house
sparrow doesn't cross it.
I grew up in Eastern Mazzzchusetts in the 50s and I remember blues in our
back yard. Now I belong to a listserv here in IL. and I've only seen one person
post that he has blues in his yard. Things are certainly more urban than they
were then!As far as weather is concerned, I have read (most recently, in John
Eastman's Birds of Filed and Shore) that "Northern bluebird populations always will,
however, be subject to periodic crashes- probably once every 10 to 15 years-
because of harsh weather, which results in widespread insect decreases and
consequent bluebird starvation." Eastman's also says, though, on a considerably
brighter note, that from 1996 when breeding bird studies began to 1996, eastern
bluebird populations have increased 103 %! Since we KNOW house sparrow populations
have not gone down, guess what is the most popular theory for this revival is?
You and me!
Judy Mellin
NE IL.
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 16:50:02 EST
From: Phl806"at"cs.com
Subject: Re: [Bluebird] Where did all the Eastern Bluebirds go?
In a Message dated 11/5/00 10:14:20 AM Central Standard Time, springer"at"alltel.net
writes:
Has anyone read about, heard people talk about, or remember a wide spread
kill off similar to the one cited for 1895, in the years between the early
40's and the early 50's?
well, i can remember a few years ago, perhaps 1995, when bb's by the
thousands died in alabama and georgia. it was in early april, a hard freeze. an
old timer i knew in birmingham alabama (who has since died) who lost hundreds of
bb's on his trail. up to a dozen in each box, crowded together to get warmth
from each other. all of his birds died that spring. it can not be underestimated
when asking "where did all the eastern bluebirds go?"
Phil Berry
Gulf Breeze, FL
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 16:53:23 EST
From: Phl806"at"cs.com
Subject: Re: [Bluebird] Where did all the Eastern Bluebirds go?
In a Message dated 11/5/00 11:04:06 AM Central Standard Time,
kridler"at"1starnet.com writes:
The 1890's cold wave that wiped out the cattle industry from Montana to Texas
and ended the open range and caused a worldwide depression.
if you have a texas almanac handy, you will find a year when galveston bay
froze solid. if i recall correctly, it was 1899, just one year before the
destructive hurricane in the same city.
Phil Berry
Gulf Breeze, FL
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 17:20:26 EST
From: Edandmj30084"at"aol.com
Subject: Re: [Bluebird] Where did all the Eastern Bluebirds go?
Hi Phil,
Any information on the plight of Bluebirds the year Mobile Bay and Lake
Pontchartrain froze?( It may have been 1984.) I remember being in New Orleans
for the Sugar Bowl, and many hotels and restaurants were without water due to
frozen and broken plumbing.
Conversely, could the unusually mild winters of recent years be responsible
for the increase in the number of Bluebirds we're seeing now?
Mary Jane
Tucker, GA
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 10:07:51 EST
From: JaneHopeC"at"aol.com
Subject: Re: Where did all the Eastern Bluebirds go?
In a Message dated 11/4/00 11:49:02 PM Eastern Standard Time, springer"at"alltel.net
writes:
I believe it is important to know what happened to the population of Eastern
Bluebirds so it isn't threatened again.
I agree. In cases of birds that have become extinct that I have read about
biologists speak of two kinds of causes. Ultimate - the prime mover that sets in
motion the extinction - and proximate - later genetic, physiological and
environmental factors that befall a species whose extinction has already been
set in motion by the ultimate cause. Some examples: the ivory billed woodpecker
- ultimate cause was deforestation, proximate causes were nest infestation by
mites, scattered populations and inbreeding. The carolina parakeet - ultimate
cause either deforestation or competition from the introduced european honeybee
which took over the hollow trees that the birds are thought to have used for
nesting, proximate causes were shooting and live capture.
Both the above mentioned birds became extinct quite some time ago. The
situation is probably more complicated for the bluebird whose numbers dropped
to their lowest in the middle of the last (20th) century when there are many
more factors to consider.Keith admirably outlined many of the various causes
which may have contributed to the bluebird's endangerment. It seems to me
that the ultimate cause for the bluebird's decline was probably in motion
and that the early bluebirders saved the bird from finally succumbing to the
proximate causes. Does this sound sensible to anyone else? It also seems to
me that if some biologist or ornithologist has not already done the research
to identify the different kinds of causes then someone should. This research
has included in some of the other cases not only the writings of birders and
ornithologists but oral reports by farmers etc. Just the kind of thing Gary
is quoting. I think it would be important to know what factors we have the
ability to and should be putting our energy into combatting the most.
Jane
Pound Ridge
NY
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:05:47 EST
From: Tsapling"at"aol.com
Subject: Re: Where did all the Eastern Bluebirds go?
In a Message dated 11/6/00 7:48:54 AM Pacific Standard Time, JaneHopeC"at"aol.com
writes:
re extinction of carolina parakeet and ivory billed woodpecker
If scientists can bring back the hairy mammoth, I think they could bring back
the carolina parakeet and the ivory billed woodpecker and possibly bluebirds in
the future. Yes it is easier to keep them from going extinct, but how about
figuring out how to bury dead ones so that the DNA has the max chance of
surviving? Afterall Cornell is involved. Maybe freezing is the best answer. Peat
was a good preservative in Ireland. Afterall the Smithsonian has a library of
seeds and also one for yeast (and fungi too?) in case they get wiped out.
Tina
Calif
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 11:47:48 -0600
From: "Gilliam, Jay" GILLIAMJT"at"phibred.com
Subject: RE: Where did all the Eastern Bluebirds go?
Tina---
You wouldn't have to bury dead birds so the DNA had the maximal chance of
surviving . One would just have to extract DNA from a live bird and store it
under the correct conditions. DNA frozen at -80C or in liquid nitrogen can last
quite a long time. You would have better chances at obtaining good quality DNA
this way.
Jay Gilliam
Norwalk, IA
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 13:29:21 EST
From: JaneHopeC"at"aol.com
Subject: Re: Where did all the Eastern Bluebirds go?
Yes, I'm sure this is important work too, that should continue along with our
efforts to stop species going extinct in the first place. I just don't know
enough about it to know if it's ever really going to be possible. Wouldn't it be
great though if we could have the ivory billed woodpecker, carolina parakeet and
so many others back!
Jane
Pound Ridge
NY
Gary & Nick:
While most of the eastern United States was forested, there were numerous
clearings where the Indians had their corn fields. Since the Indians used "slash
and burn" agricultural techniques, there were always old fields which were gone
to weeds and grass and older fields with brush, etc. In addition the Indians set
fires to the woods in the autumn to clear away underbrush and make hunting
easier and encourage new sprouts for deer browse.
The result of these two cultural techniques was an open, park-like forest
with numerous clearings, very different from the forest we know. This would
have been ideal bluebird habitat. So the bluebird population, here in southern
New England at least, probably was considerably higher than it is now.
--Jill Miller
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 18:03:13 -0600
From: "Fread J. Loane" firefrost2"at"earthlink.net
Subject: Re: Bluebirds BC (before Columbus)
Here in what is known as "The Four State Area", comprised of Missouri,
Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas, anthropologists excavating beneath bluff
shelters will often use a technique called Pollen Flotation Analysis. As ancient
soils are exposed during the excavation of a site, some of that soil is put into
water and the "scum" that forms on the top is then skimmed off, dried and then
analyzed with a microscope. What scientists are looking for are minute grains of
pollens which are nearly indestructible. They can then identify what the
landscape was like at that point in time. Here in this area, it has been proven
that it has always been what can be properly called "Edge Habitat". This would
be natural prairie interspersed with woodlands and would be prime habitat for
Sialia sialis to exist in.the time period I am talking about here is known as
the Ozark Bluff Dweller Period and would predate Columbus and up into the
1600's.
Fread J. Loane
Tulsa,Oklahoma...
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 08:05:35 EST
From: "dean sheldon"
Subject: EARLY BLUEBIRD HISTORY
Bluebirding history buffs will be interested in an excellent illustrated
presentation by Richard M.Tuttle which is to be made at the 24th Annual NABS'
Convention in Columbus, Ohio on Saturday June 23, 2001. Dick's talk is entitled
"THE BEAVER HYPOTHESIS: BLUEBIRDING BEFORE THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY." Lots of
research and "in the field" work have been done in preparing for this unique
bluebirding program. Dick joins a distinguished group of speakers at the
conference including: Andy Troyer, Jamie Hill and Jim Berry. And the four of
them are joined by Julie Zickefoose, who is the banquet speaker on that same
evening. Details regarding this remarkable Convention can be obtained from the
NABS webpage at. Click on Annual
Convention/then on More Information and you'll get the whole story. Reservations
are already being taken at the Airport Radisson and the number of Convention
resevations is already increasing(a form is on the website for your use). We
hope that you will consider making this a part of your summer plans. Thank you!!
From: Kerry Sweet
Date: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: Wint. dist.
...
Bruce I have another question...
The scientific name for Eastern Bluebird is Sialia Sialis... So does
that mean Sialia means Eastern and Sialis means Bluebird? I guess the
question is if I get a license plate for my car with the word Sialia
on it ... what is it going to actually say?? I thought Sialia meant
Bluebird but the map you showed me it has the word Sialis also...???
I'm confused!!!
Kerry in Okla.Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 14:12:01 -0500
From: "Bruce Burdett"
Subject: Re: Wint. dist.
Kerry, et al,
My understanding is that "Sialia" is from the Greek, meaning simply "a kind of
bird". The "sialis" indicates the particular commonest variety of "Sialia".
Other varieties are "mexicana" and "currucoides." Neither "Sialia" nor "sialis"
means specifically "Bluebird." Just who decided to name the Eastern Bluebird
"Sialia sialis", and when it was so named, I have no idea.
Many species are named in a similar way. For example, the Eastern Kingbird,
which is the commonest one, is called "Tyrannus tyrannus", I'd guess
because of its (notice NO apostrophe on 'its') habit of harassing various
things, like crows. There's even a "Tyrannus melancholicus" or Tropical
Kingbird, which is doubtless a very sad sort of bird.
Some of these names are quite picturesque. The Raccoon (sp?) is called, I
believe, "Procyon lotor," which means literally "Before meal, washer". Is that
cool, or what?
I'm sure that more scholarly types than I will give you more detailed
information than this, including the exact meaning of "currucoides," which I
can't find at the moment. Maybe it has to do with mountains.
Bruce Burdett, Saskatchewan Bluebird Conspiracy, Regina, Sask.
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 16:47:28 -0600
From: "Fread J. Loane"
Subject: Etymological Search: Sialia sialis, for Bruce & Kerry
Etymology is part of the linguistic science of tracing the origin or development
of a word, or other form, back as far as possible in its own language and then
to its source in contemporary or earlier languages. In most dictionaries,
etymologies are given in brackets [.....] following the part of speech label of
a word.
Let us explore the proper Latin bi-nominal (bi two; nominal names) for our
Easter Bluebird: Sialia sialis.
Sialia is a noun, and should always be capitalized. Phonetically speaking the
word is pronounced correctly as "sy-al-lay-uh". The word comes from New Latin,
that was taken from the Greek word "sialis", which means 'a bird', plus the New
Latin ephiphet or inflection "ia".
Now, that was fairly easy. Let us go to the next part of the name sialis.
The second word sialis, can be, and often is, a descriptive word describing
Sialia. The etymology of this word is also derived from New Latin, which was
taken from the Greek word meaning "a bird", however in this context
of being descriptive, we have to go one step further to the word Sialid.
A sialid is a member of the insect family known as Sialidae. The Family of
insects known as Sialidae are neuopterous insects (belonging to the Order
Neuoptera; carnivorous insects including the Lace Wings and Ant Lions, with four
finely veined membranous wings and biting mouth parts), and within this Family
are the Dobson Flies......and here is where we get the descriptive part of
sialis.
Many of you with a rural heritage will recall watching flying insects around a
pond or slough on a lazy summer day. Amongst those insects was a smaller,
dragonfly-like critter of the most marvelous blue color! That is the Dobson Fly.
Now, let us put this together: Sialia bird; sialis blue. Can you now see how
Linnaeus, the Father of Botany as well as the Father of Genetics, contrived his
system of applying two names?
Who was Linnaeus? Carl von Linne lived from 1707-1778. He was a very talented
dedicated naturalist, botanist, and taxonomist in Sweden. The Latinized form of
his name is generally used to recognize his work in Latin. "Linne" is
transformed into "Linnaeus".
Linnaeus is recognized as the man who established the universal system of
binominal nomenclature. Latin was chosen for its precision and economy of words.
Linnaeus made it a universal language; a valuable working tool, once acquired,
opening stores of taxonomic information which could not be found anywhere else!
As a professional horticulturist, my life is bathed in Latin binominals.
Simply imagine the astronomical tasks of learning all the major languages of the
world just so you could read. Books written in their own vernaculars would have
been largely unread, unknown, and completely ineffective. The development of any
science is necessarily a co-operative effort. When written in Latin, these books
then became a direct contribution to a common pool of learning.
Bruce and Kerry, I hope that this clears up your questions and adds to your
knowledge.
Fread J. Loane
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 18:40:14 -0500
From: Bill & Dot Forrester wforres1"at"twcny.rr.com
Subject: Re: [Bluebird] Etymological Search: Sialia sialis, for Bruce & Kerry
I agree, Fread. Latin is a neat and versatile language. As a former English
teacher, I deeply regret that U.S. schools have dropped their requirements for
Latin, leading to the poor vocabulary and lack of precise thinking of many
otherwise well-prepared students. Thanks for the information on the Eastern
Bluebird.
Dot
Latin was chosen for its precision and economy of words. Linnaeus made it
a universal language; a valuable working tool, once acquired, opening stores
of taxonomic information which could not be found anywhere else! As a professional
horticulturist, my life is bathed in Latin binominals.
From: Bet Zimmerman, ezdz"at"charter.net
Sent: Thursday, December 18,
2003 10:41 AM
Subject: Dates for 90% data point regarding
EABL decline?
I see the following factoid all over the net - that bluebird
populations declined 90% - but the dates vary - starting from the late 1800's,
1920 or 1930 up to 1970, 80 and 90. Does anybody know where this data point
came from and what the REAL dates are? Bet from CT
From: Evelyn Cooper, emcooper"at"bayou.com
Sent: Thursday, December
18, 2003 11:04 AM
Subject: RE:
Dates for 90% data point regarding EABL decline?
In "Bluebirds!" by Grooms & Peterson
on page 63 it states: "Zeleny wrote that bluebird populations declined
drastically from the late 1920's to the late 1970's. He estimated that
eastern bluebird population had decreased by 90% over that period. Zeleny
based those estimates on his own recollections and those of other friends
of bluebirds who had lived long enough to see the disturbing changes in
their populations.
Beginning 1966, the U.S. Wildlife Service has conducted
a comprehensive annual North American Breeding Survey (BBS). A paper
written in 1990 by John R. Sauer and Sam Droege attemted to define trends in
the BBS data. That data documented widespread bluebird declines in the 1966-1978
period."Extreme local declines" followed
the especially severe winters of 1976, 1977 and 1978. Sauer and Droger's
analysis suggested "climatic events' as the most significant factor." In
some of the older books of the 1800's, it talks about thousands of Bluebirds
being found dead during the severe cold spells. In "Bluebirds Forever",
by Connie Toops, it states that it will happen again from time to time.
Evelyn
From: Stan Blaylock, stanb103"at"bellsouth.net"
Sent: Thursday, December 18,
2003 3:21 PM
Subject: Sauer and Droger's analysis
Sauer and Droger's analysis suggested "climatic events'
as the most significant factor. What can we as
Bluebirders do about this??
From: Karen
Harder, karenh"at"praxisworks.org
Sent: Thursday, December
18, 2003 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: Dates
for 90% data point regarding EABL decline?
In my 1949 copy of
The Birds of Concord [MA], Ludlow Griscom says: "Eastern Bluebird Sialia
sialis sialis (Linnaeus) Formerly a very common summer resident,
abundant on migration; steadily declining since 1900. Subject to spring losses
in the north and heavy winter losses in the south.... 1905-1917.
Rapid decline. 1917-1927. Apparently continued decline. 1940-1948. Marked
increase, the breeding birds more than doubling;..." That's for
one very small area, of course, but it might be indicative of
the overall trend.
Karen Harder -- Cape Porpoise, Maine
From: Lawrence Herbert, lherbert"at"4state.com
Sent: Monday, December
22, 2003 4:28 PM
Subject: EABL population There was a discussion
recently on the population of our Eastern Bluebird. [note from webmaster:
see myths discussion.] I have had bluebird trails in appropriate habitat since
1971. I randomly selected five years for those years for % of boxes used: 1976
- 18 % 1983 - 50 % 1987 - 64 % 1989 - 70% 1992 - 82 % (N = 111 nest boxes in
Kansas and Missouri). It appears that the EABL population has increased in
KS and MO for those years for sure.
Good birding, Larry H. Joplin MO. Lawrence Herbert
From: Keith & Sandy Kridler, txbluebirder"at"sbcglobal.net
Sent: Wednesday,
December 24, 2003 8:54 AM
Subject: Arbor Day 1911
The governor of Ohio, Judson Harmon, designated Friday
April 7, 1911 for observance of Arbor Day and also bird day. All teachers
across the state were supposed to teach their students a minimum of two hours,
(preferably they were to spend all day) about trees and birds. They were instructed
to encourage the students to help the birds and plant trees and flowers all
year long. They were to go out and actually plant trees and learn how to help
the "good
birds".All schools were sent out a 50 page supplement in 1911 to go along
with the 1910 Arbor Day book.
I found it interesting that the very FIRST
nestbox pictured in the supplement is a two entrance holed nestbox hanging
from a tree limb. Looks a LOT like the nestboxes Linda Violett's grand
dad would have been using:-))) They show a family of baby birds nestled down
in this two holed nestbox in the second photo. It is an old wood pail
with three metal bands around the bucket and a sheet metal roof was installed
over the top. They simply used the wire bucket handle to hang this nestbox
over a sturdy tree limb pretty high up in a large tree.
On the page "How
to attract birds" Figure #1 is a
20 compartment purple martin house with a perch below every entrance hole.
Fig. #2 shows a nestbox made from a hollowed out log hung horizontally. (fore
runner of the Tree Branch Nest Box.) Fig. #3 shows a large floor size nestbox
with the entrance hole offset to one side of the front with a perch below
the hole. Fig. #4 shows a saucer filled with water for drinking or bathing
sitting on a platform attached to a tree trunk. Fig.#5 is the interesting
one! It shows a very deep nestbox with a tin can attached over the entrance
hole as a predator guard. The sharp edges of the open can end face out with
the "tongue" of the
sharp lid used as a landing platform. Similar to Jim Noel's sharp edged wire
predator guard and is VERY similar to the PVC predator guard that Don Hutchings
uses in East Texas and both are shown in The Bluebird Monitor's Guide. This
shows that predator guards were common and being used 90 years ago.
Figure
#6 shows a sunflower plant, something any child can plant for the
birds! Figure #7 Is something that evidently did not catch on! It is a wood
box attached to a tree limb and filled with sand for the birds to dust themselves
in! ...
The only three birds with their very own article in this supplement
are the Meadow Lark, Grackle and the Bluebird. Ohio's game laws protected
some, maybe most of the birds at this time. Quoted from part of the bird protection
part follows: "No
part of the plumage, skin, or body of any bird protected by this
section ((they specifically named 43 birds kk)) shall be sold or had in possession
for sale. No person shall at any time disturb, or destroy the eggs,
or nests, or young, of any of the birds named in this section. Provided,
that nothing in this section shall prohibit the killing of the chicken hawk,
blue-hawk, crow, great horned owl, or the English sparrow, at any time, except
on the first day of the week known as Sunday, by anybody, or destroying of
their nests." This gave the residents of the state
free hand to kill nearly every large hawk and owl they found on
any day except Sunday. In 1911 they were teaching these students
what birds to shoot or destroy!
The first Arbor day in Ohio was
in 1882 and in Cincinnati all 17,000 students were given two
whole days off from school to help professional foresters plant trees
in and around the city. By 1911 it was hoped that on Arbor
Day nationally in FORTY states that 250,000 acres of trees would be
planted or about 6,000 acres of trees per state or 6 million
trees per state. The governor berated the Ohio teachers in this supplement
because after 30 years of Arbor Days that few school yards
had a SINGLE tree that had survived or even been planted! Most of the
photos showed Ohio children planting trees in open plains and
tree less city lots that could have been in Kansas! ... Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant, Texas
From: Gary Springer, springer"at"alltel.net
Sent: Thursday, December
25, 2003 1:47 AM
Subject: Vintage nestboxes
Keith wrote: "........ I found it interesting that the very FIRST nestbox
pictured in the supplement(1911) is a two entrance holed nestbox hanging
from a tree limb. Looks a LOT like the nestboxes Linda Violett's grand dad
would have been using:-)))........." The first memories of nestboxes were
of those my grandfather put up. Even though the house my grandparents lived
in decades ago had burnt to the ground about ten years ago, I began to wonder
if any of his nestboxes might still be on the property.
Three years ago I
took a road trip to the site of the former house and to my pleasant surprise,
one of his nestboxes was still attached to the top of a metal pole along
the fence line at the back of the property. Though it was entangled in
honeysuckle and at least 30 years old, it was in excellent condition and
had long outlasted its builder. The reason it lasted so long is that it had
an excellently constructed metal roof, and, it was bolted onto the top of
a metal pole from inside the nestbox. Given the quality of the neighborhood
at present, I feel quite certain others had tried to remove it but had failed.
I had to strike the bottom of the box with the palm of my hand dozens of
times before finally splitting the wood and freeing the box from the pole.
Both my mother's and father's side of the family were accused of over engineering
everything and the way that nestbox was built and mounted is further proof
of the merit of the accusation..
Anyway, the reason I now write about that
nest box is that it two was a vintage two hole nestbox. This gable roof
nestbox with a pentagonal front also sported a two by two inch glass window
in the back to make observing the nesting birds easier and a heavy eyebolt
below one of the entrance holes to be used as a perch. I feel quite certain
the box was intended for house wrens which my grandfather deployed to control
insects in his gardens. But, the holes had been enlarged, apparently by
a small woodpecker, and it was subsequently used by house sparrows, probably
for decades. It was filled from top to bottom with the compacted residue
left by nesting birds. In this solid dirt-like mix were straw, feathers,
bits of cellophane and several unhatched house sparrow eggs at various
depths.
That two hole nestbox has now been taken out of service for house
sparrows and placed in the Old Growth Forests, Inc. birdhouse collection
which also has an original Joe Huber "Flip Flop" box,
an original "Huber Sparrow Trap", meticulously constructed box number 53
from Harry Krueger's bluebird trail, a Jack Finch "Homes for Bluebird's" box,
a Keith Kridler log box, the Chalet returned by Steve Eno after his
approval, a Bob Wilson double walled PVC box and others.
...Gary
Springer
From: Keith & Sandy Kridler, txbluebirder"at"sbcglobal.net
Sent:
Friday, March 05, 2004 7:44 AM
Subject: Bluebird increase
over the years Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant, Texas
Christy mentioned that they
fledged 59 last year in an area of Florida that they did not even think
they had bluebirds. Once you get a breeding population of bluebirds and you
have unlimited good habitat then with enough nestboxes scattered over the
area then it is common to be able to quadruple the numbers of young birds
fledged annually if you keep adding more monitors and more nestboxes. So
they should be able to fledge about 260 bluebirds this year if weather remains
good and predators can be kept from the nestboxes. If your trail fledged
15 bluebirds last year then within two miles, you or your neighbors should
add another 15 nestboxes:-))) Add one nestbox to every cemetery in your county,
if you get native cavity nesters then add another box at the other end of
the cemetery. You should always have up about 25% of your boxes that are
empty and ready for a bird to move in no matter how many nestboxes you have
in an area. Cheap nestboxes: Ask your local high school if they have a wood/shop
class. Mt. Pleasant boys built 39 nestboxes last week and I donated another
load of lumber to them yesterday. Builders and lumber yards often will donate
scrap or even good lumber for school projects. Cavity nester programs given
to fifth grade science classes will let you know if they have good habitat
and then the young students with correct habitat can monitor the boxes built
by Master Gardeners or Master Naturalists or high school boys this coming
summer. Boy Scouts can earn badges and awards for wood working and bird
conservation. Buy and loan out some of the tapes or DVD's to groups in your
area, loan them to that neighbor next door you don't know yet! Bluebird Math
in an eggshell! Information/education + nestboxes = cavity nesters. Information/education
+ nestboxes + monitoring = more cavity nesters Information/education +
nestboxes + monitoring - non native competitors - predators = the most native
cavity nesters These birds are basically very simple creatures with very
simple needs we tend to forget that they survived for millions of years raising
their young in any cavity they could find. Keep to simple math on a grand
scale and you will fill the sky with blue "ribbons." KK
From: Nancy C. Hebb, Fencroft"at"msn.com
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: Bluebird increase over the years
Keith, you made my day. I was accused of being excessive because I put
up 20 boxes last year and ended up with five pairs of blues (two raised three
broods of 5, three raised two broods of four and five), three pairs of tree
swallows, two pairs of black-capped chickadees, two pairs of tufted titmice,
and three pairs of wrens...leaving five boxes unoccupied. Then I bought
10 more boxes some of which I put up between broods (and a couple pairs moved
for their second nesting), and I recently got 8 more. They're predicting
snow and 30s by the end of the weekend which is hard to believe as we're at
a record 66 today, with rain and incredible winds. Blues are hiding. Males
have placed some claim straws, but it's all show for each other at this point!
So, I'm not crazy getting all those boxes, huh? I'll have to send your
post to all my nay-sayers who think I'm nuts. Nancy in Michigan
No, you are not crazy. We have learned that the young come back to the place
they were born to nest. I am fortunate that there are many natural nesting
cavities all around me. Show your nay-sayers the information!!
I think I told this before that at the end of 2003 nesting season, I could
see them lined up on the power lines of Cooper Road for 3 1/2 miles and I
am the only one with a trail in my community other than 2 other boxes. Six
years ago, you could not see Bluebirds there on the power lines. I know I
am making a difference. What a sight to see!!
Evelyn Cooper
Delhi, LA
From: Bruce Burdett, blueburd"at"tds.net
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: Bluebird increase over the years
Nancy, et al,
I've been through this litany
before, but for the newbies I'll repeat it in essence and in brief. I
monitor 72 Bluebird houses at present. All are paired, all are on other people's
property, all are on 7' steel poles, all are NABS-type and made of 7/8"white
pine, and all are side-opening. Every year every pair of houses has one Tree
Swallow nesting and one only. The remaining 36 houses produce, depending
on the weather, between 12 and 21 Bluebird nestings, about half of which
have 2nd nestings.
I would
never, ever expect to get 72 Bluebird nestings, since half my houses
are taken by Tree Swallows and INTENDED for them.. I would be ASTONISHED if I ever
got 36, or even 26, though I always hope. A few of my houses are always left
vacant. I get a scattering of House Wrens, and luckily NO House Sparrows. "Failed" houses
are my own fault in every case, because of poor location, mostly. So
don't be dismayed, Nancy, if you don't get 100% occupancy. In my experience
it's unheard-of. Just be thankful and happy with the successes you have,
and keep putting up all the houses you can find good locations for. Bruce
Burdett, SW NH
From: Nancy C. Hebb, Fencroft"at"msn.com
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 1:05 PM
Subject: Re: Bluebird increase over the years
I never thought I'd get 100% occupancy! But those who shook their heads
at my repeated influx of additional boxes didn't understand WHY more might
be needed. Thus my appreciation of the post I was responding to....and
I'm wondering why no HOSP, except that I repeatedly removed any nests built
by them before eggs were laid. They have plenty of room in and around
the barn, I guess, so have not yet proved competitive over the boxes. (I
do trap as as many as possible, but it's like a drop in the proverbial bucket
compared to the numbers around here.) My boxes are paired where possible, too. I
have only had one where bb and tree swallows paired up, and for a reason I
cannot figure out, the blues abandoned that nest with two eggs in it and re-started
in another box nearer to the buildings here. The swallows successfully
fledged theirs from the box paired with the abandoned one. The swallows,
I thought, were ignoring the blues and helping defend the area with the blues
so I was surprised when the bluebird pair moved. Of course, this is a
brand new "trail" where none existed the year before and the options available
outnumbered the birds competing for boxes. There's an abundance of natural
cavities nearby as well. My neighbor has about five boxes on two acres, very
close together, and ALWAYS gets a mix of blues, swallows, and wrens, with none
seeming to bother the others. ...Nancy in Michigan
From: Snoopy, snoopy"at"wmis.net
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 1:14 PM
Subject: Re: Bluebird increase over the years
I have to agree with Bruce.... I only have 7 boxes.... 3 sets are paired
and one is single. I usually only have 1 or 2 boxes that have bluebirds
in them. Then I usually have 2 or 3 with swallows. A few have always
remained empty. A few always have house sparrows trying to nest in them.
(which I promptly eliminate) I had a wren once (last year). I
dont' ever "expect" them all to be full...and I think if it ever
got that way it would be too crowded and I'd have to erect more houses. lol. Joy
in Michigan ...
From: ke4fej1"at"email.msn.com
Sent: Friday, March 05,
2004 6:52 AM
Re: Bluebird increase over the years
Hi All, Gee, 100% occupancy!
What a thought....sounds like a fantastic Goal! Remember when I started
we had not seen one around here. By the end of the season I believe we
had close to 190 boxes up. But through the 2003 season we started with
99, and then only 27 boxes were used. .. 59 fledged 117 total eggs/babies
Who would have thought? I sure didn't but I have gone fishing many a
place the fish were not or should not be,,,but I still went.....ya just never
know what you get unless you try. When I saw that first BB on my back
line, I figured if there is one, there could be more, and maybe I can help.
Keith I think you are right on with numbers.... or the word is out to the
BBs about our new neighborhoods of BB boxes. Last year we started our Official
Monitor Checking March 15....with those 99 boxes.... We are really on
the move right now and so are the BBs.... I will post on the 15th just one
year later what we are starting with..... to me it is unreal...but it
is happening!!!! Never bothered me to even think that boxes were not going
to be used... I was used to the idea that NONE of them were going to
be used. With my Monitors that never see BBs or had a nesting, I tell them
Keith's story of the man who checked for 20 years until he got a BB.
So the Monitors know what they might be up against. Luckily things are not
that bad. It is like Christmas every day here now... stay tuned...don't
feel bad you don't have BBs yet... remember being first to get them...we
are also first to stop breeding too.... Think Bluebird! Christy Sarasota,
FL
From: PTom, ptom"at"austin.rr.com
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 7:05
PM
Re: Bluebird increase over the years
Christy wrote, "With my Monitors
that never see BBs or had a nesting, I tell them Keith's story of the man
who checked for 20 years until he got a BB. So the Monitors know what they
might be up against." I'm sure I remember
when that man posted on Bluebird-L ... probably five years ago. It was
a nestbox in his front yard. Does anyone remember who it was or have a
copy of the post? I use that story, too, and I'd like to know who it was
and the fine details. Pauline Tom Mountain City (no mountains) TX
From: Keith Kridler
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004
Re: Bluebird increase over the years
...When NABS annual
convention was in Montreal I was introduced to a man who had maintained
over 500 nestboxes that fledged thousands of swallows and other native cavity
nesters and after 10 years he had his first pair of Eastern Bluebirds nest.
His trail was located more than 150 miles north of Montreal. Bluebird numbers
increasing four fold a year: In East Texas in the mid to late 1970's our
bluebird trail fledge numbers grew at 400% annual rate with nestboxes being
increased at about 80% annually. The Montana group started with a handful
of bluebird fledglings during the early years and then with good nestboxes
and good monitors their numbers exploded. Severe weather in northern states
is devastating to nesting birds some years so they cannot sustain this
growth. I believe they had pulled the known nesting spots of the Eastern
bluebird more than 800 miles from the eastern part of their state into the
central part of the state in just a decade. Nebraska bluebird growth is unbelievable
considering historically they had almost NO TREES in the state and their
national forest was all planted not "natural". Modern nestbox trails now
have to deal with probably 10 times the numbers of nestbox raiding hawks,
magpies, jays, crows and owls. It seems like every state is dealing with
farms being cut up and the frontage sold off for 1>3 acre homesites with
each having a couple of cats and dogs...Fur trapping is non-existent today
in most states and four legged predator numbers are exploding with only
cars to limit their numbers. In the early 1980's to late 1980's Harry Krueger's
fledge numbers near Ore City, Texas grew at about this same 400% annual
rate to the point with his adult bluebird fidelity to nest site/fidelity
to mate; banding study that his 60 nestboxes would have 58 or 59 nestboxes
being used at the same time exclusively by bluebirds. Harry Krueger started
with one nesting pair in his back yard and quickly went to nearly 75 pairs
using 60 nestboxes during a 7 month long breeding season. 15>20% of his
adult bluebird banded pairs SUCCESSFULLY fledged four broods in 7 months.
His adult recaptured bluebirds were on average about twice the age of most
northern adult bluebirds being recaptured and their band numbers checked
across the northeastern states up to this time. (migrating birds face more
losses traveling thousands of miles) All his nestboxes were on smooth metal
pipe, all poles were greased monthly with 9 parts axle grease thinned with
one part turpentine, all poles had mesh snake traps installed and whenever
cats were seen along his trail the boxes were raised on telescoping poles
to 10 feet. All his boxes had a wood front that measured 1&3/4" thick.
He eradicated fire ants 12 months out of the year. He checked his active
nestboxes EVERYDAY until they fledged. He averaged fledging 1.5 more young
per nest attempt annually than I did on my trail with nestboxes mounted
to wood power poles. He exterminated House Sparrows in winter and early
spring. Trappers removed coons and other furred predators each winter in
his area. He live trapped stray cats constantly and drove his trail at
all hours of the night at least once a week to watch for predators. Just
before his death, three years in a row he averaged fledging more than 9
bluebirds per nestbox from 60 nestboxes. Most of the experienced bluebirders
on this list read every week accounts from people that we know are going
to lead to disaster for some of these nesting birds. The more you learn
and then the more money you are willing to invest in each nestbox/pole
and the better your local habitat and more intense your monitoring will
all lead to a quicker increase in bluebird numbers in an area. Mother nature
and disease ultimately determine the number of bluebirds allowed per square
mile to survive. Winter survival of these birds is critical because each
pair lost from August to February is actually a loss of about 9 unborn
bluebirds! Lack of good nestboxes forces them to inspect every plumbing
vent pipe and chimney in the area. It forces them to fight squirrels, chipmunks
and House Sparrows for scarce nestsites. Urban sprawl, changes in farm
land use and the amount and kinds of chemicals used by small landowners
all affect the local bluebird population. The amount and species of timber
being removed in your area affect the numbers of bluebirds that will survive
this coming winter over the entire region. All this has a direct impact
on numbers of bluebirds you will see returning this spring but more importantly
how many your grand children will see 25 years from now. KK
From: Keith & Sandy Kridler, txbluebirder"at"sbcglobal.net
Sent:
Wednesday, March 10, 2004 9:43 AM
Re:Bluebird increase
over the years Keith Kridler Mt. Pleasant, Texas
Harry Krueger's data is
in old issues of the "BLUEBIRD NEWS" which was published monthly
from 1988 till late 1993 You will find his writings also in Sialia. My old
data was published in Nature Society News starting about 1975 and in each
issue of "BLUEBIRD
NEWS". Harry was a Master Bird Bander and wrote the bluebird column for Nature
Society News for about 3 years. Some of his technical findings on his bluebird
banding study were published in North American Bird Bander, Sialia, Journal
of Field Ornithology and other birding periodicals. When bluebirds are only
one of HUNDREDS of other bird species that need more study and research and
articles printed on them then you will find that very little "bluebird trail" data
is ever or will ever be included in any major periodical. The real test of
fledgling numbers is to look at historical CBC counts and Breeding bird survey
counts for a region. Numbers from one little trail really don't mean much
but if you influence the entire region on installing nestboxes correctly
AND install a LOT of boxes then it begins to show up in these national counts.
You will notice that Northeast Texas has consistently posted some of the
highest Eastern Bluebird numbers since the 1970's. Nashville Tenn. is another
hot spot because Laskey had trails near there for about 30 years. W.G. Duncan
in his part of Kentucky, Larry Zeleny in Maryland, Jack Finch in North Carolina
all show up because of long term education of the public and there are many
other groups whose influence in a region saved and created the higher bluebird
populations in a region that modern day bluebirders have to build boxes for
now. You have to realize that we are building on the backs of early bluebirders
that communicated with handwritten letters! We all had real jobs and we all
had real families and bluebirds were only another interest that we somehow
made time for in our lives. Dr. W.G. Duncan revolutionized bluebirding in
the 1970's by personally compiling a few letters a couple of times a year
into a sort of a Nature/ecology/bluebird newsletter and having a lady make
copies on a "state of the art" Xerox office copy machine when they came down
in price to where he could afford it! He continued into the late 1970's and
at one time was personally funding/sending out 1,800 of these per issue a
couple times a year with a real licked first class stamp on them. Has anyone
ever seen even a single copy? Addresses on the newsletter were handwritten
on most of them! He did this through saved contacts made while writing for
the bluebird column for the "PURPLE MARTIN NEWS" now the "NATURE SOCIETY
NEWS". Most of the trials and tribulations of the real bluebirding pioneers
is lost forever now as very little in the way of paper records had been recorded
on something you can easily retrieve. I was avidly reading the "PURPLE MARTIN
NEWS" when Larry Zeleny wrote monthly for them and I doubt very many of his
articles are still out there now. We tend to think if you cannot pull up
the information in seconds on Yahoo that it does not exist but there are
a LOT of bluebirders looking down on us and laughing when we invent something
or write about something as NEW and ASTOUNDING that they were doing 70 years
ago. Time spent compiling more data does not fledge bluebirds but people
building more nestboxes does. KK
From: mrtony8 [mailto:mrtony8"at"cox.net]
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 9:11 AM
Subject: CBC Bluebirds in Florida
An interesting graph depicts the CBC numbers for EABL's in Florida may be
seen at http://audubon2.org/birds/cbc/hr/graph.html
We DO have an impact ! Surprising to me is the lack of birds in the early
years of the last century, but I think the explanation is that the numbers
of people counting birds were much fewer than today. Note during the depression
years of the '30's, numbers are up, only to decline later. This may be because
the government was into everything then, including counting birds, to keep
the teenagers busy. CCC camps were in every state.
Phil Berry Pensacola, Florida
|